(下边有中文翻译， 请继续看到底。 谢谢）

US Hegemony and Supremacy:

The United States has consistently sought to maintain its global hegemony, and this objective has shaped its foreign policy for decades. Since the Clinton administration, various measures have been implemented to counter the resurgence of Russia and the rise of China as a formidable global power.

During President Clinton’s tenure, the U.S. began to lay the groundwork for policies aimed at limiting Russia’s influence and preemptively addressing China’s growing economic and military strength. This approach continued through subsequent administrations, albeit with varying intensity and focus.

Under President Obama, the U.S. adopted a more nuanced strategy. While the administration recognized the need to address the challenges posed by Russia and China, it opted for a more measured approach, emphasizing diplomacy and economic engagement. Nevertheless, Obama’s “Pivot to Asia” policy marked a clear recognition of China’s rise, as the U.S. sought to strengthen alliances in the Asia-Pacific region to balance China’s growing influence.

The Trump administration marked a significant shift in U.S. strategy. President Trump openly declared China as a strategic competitor and aggressively pursued policies to contain its rise. This included a trade war, sanctions, and efforts to decouple the U.S. economy from China’s, all aimed at curbing Beijing’s global ambitions. However, Trump’s approach toward Russia was notably different; he often downplayed the Russian threat and sought a more conciliatory relationship with Moscow, leading to mixed signals in U.S. foreign policy.

With the advent of the Biden administration, U.S. policy took on a more confrontational stance. President Biden introduced a series of stringent measures designed to counter Russia’s assertiveness, particularly in Eastern Europe, and to further contain China’s expanding influence. Unlike his predecessors, Biden adopted a more holistic approach, rallying U.S. allies and partners into a cohesive front against both China and Russia. This involved strengthening NATO, forming new alliances such as AUKUS, and pushing for coordinated economic, military, and technological initiatives to counteract the perceived threats from these two nations.

Biden’s administration has been marked by a clear, aggressive strategy to ensure the U.S. retains its dominant position on the global stage. Through diplomatic pressure, economic sanctions, military posturing, and alliance-building, the U.S. has solidified its commitment to countering the revival of Russia and the rise of China, making it a central pillar of its foreign policy agenda.

The US could not Sustain its supremacy and hegemony:

However, the United States has struggled to effectively compete with China and Russia on several crucial fronts, including economic, political, and diplomatic arenas. As China’s economic influence expanded globally through initiatives like the Belt and Road, and Russia’s assertive diplomacy and military strategy gained traction, the U.S. found its traditional dominance increasingly challenged. This shift has led to a noticeable rise in anti-American sentiments worldwide, as many nations perceive the U.S. as a declining power clinging to an outdated model of global leadership.

Faced with these growing challenges, the U.S. has begun to seriously question its ability to maintain its supremacy and hegemony on the world stage. Recognizing that its economic and diplomatic influence is waning, the U.S. has resorted to a more aggressive display of military power, particularly in the Middle East.

In a desperate bid to reassert its global influence, the U.S. has chosen the Middle East as a focal point to demonstrate its military might. The region, already fraught with tensions, has become the stage for America’s renewed show of force. The U.S. has been significantly bolstering its military presence across the Middle East, extending its military buildup not only within key strategic locations but throughout the entire region. This includes deploying additional troops, advanced weaponry, and sophisticated war machines, all aimed at projecting power and securing its interests in a region that remains vital to global energy supplies and geopolitical stability.

This military expansion in the Middle East underscores the U.S.’s strategic pivot towards a more forceful approach, as it seeks to compensate for its diminishing influence in other areas. By doing so, the U.S. aims to remind the world of its military capabilities, even as its economic and diplomatic dominance continues to face serious challenges.

In response to the growing tensions in the Middle East, particularly involving Israel, Arab states, and Iran, the United States has recently bolstered its military presence in the region. This escalation includes the deployment of additional troops, naval forces, and advanced air assets to deter potential conflicts and reassure regional allies.

Recent Deployments:

1. USS Gerald R. Ford Carrier Strike Group

Location: Eastern Mediterranean

Naval Force: USS Gerald R. Ford, the newest and most advanced aircraft carrier in the U.S. Navy, along with its strike group, including guided-missile destroyers, cruisers, and support vessels.

Air Force: The carrier group brings over 70 aircraft, including F/A-18 Super Hornets, E-2D Hawkeye early warning aircraft, and EA-18G Growlers for electronic warfare.

Weapons and Technologies: Advanced radar systems, missile defense capabilities, and cutting-edge electronic warfare systems.

Purpose: Provides a significant air and naval strike capability, ready to respond rapidly to any escalation in the region, particularly concerning Iran’s activities.

2. B-1B Lancer Bombers

Location: Al Udeid Air Base, Qatar

Air Force: Deployment of B-1B Lancer strategic bombers.

Weapons: Capable of carrying a wide array of munitions, including conventional bombs, cruise missiles, and precision-guided munitions.

Advanced Technologies: Long-range strike capability, high speed, and advanced radar-evading features.

Purpose: Enhances the U.S. ability to conduct long-range strike missions and supports deterrence efforts against Iran and other regional threats.

3. F-35 and F-15 Squadrons

Location: Various bases in Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Jordan

Air Force: Deployment of additional F-35 Lightning II and F-15 Eagle fighter jets.

Weapons: Equipped with air-to-air missiles, precision-guided bombs, and advanced targeting systems.

Advanced Technologies: Stealth capabilities (F-35), superior maneuverability (F-15), and cutting-edge avionics.

Purpose: Enhances air superiority, surveillance, and strike capabilities in the region, providing rapid response options for any aerial threats.

4. Patriot Missile Defense Systems and THAAD

Location: Saudi Arabia, UAE, and other Gulf states

Air Force: Deployment of additional Patriot missile defense systems and Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) systems.

Weapons: Capable of intercepting short- to medium-range ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, and advanced aircraft.

Advanced Technologies: Integrated radar and command systems, capable of detecting and neutralizing multiple threats simultaneously.

Purpose: Strengthens regional missile defense against potential Iranian ballistic missile attacks, protecting key infrastructure and U.S. assets.

5. Amphibious Ready Group (ARG) with the 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU)

Location: Arabian Gulf

Naval Force: Includes amphibious assault ships such as the USS Bataan, capable of deploying Marines and their equipment for rapid-response missions.

Weapons and Technologies: Helicopters, MV-22 Ospreys, amphibious vehicles, and advanced logistics support.

Purpose: Provides a versatile force capable of conducting amphibious assaults, humanitarian assistance, and rapid deployment of ground forces in response to crises.

6. Additional Troop Deployments

Location: Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and other undisclosed locations

Number of Troops: Several thousand additional troops have been deployed.

Weapons and Technologies: Equipped with advanced infantry weapons, armored vehicles, drones, and electronic warfare tools.

Purpose: Reinforces U.S. ground presence, improves readiness for rapid deployment, and supports ongoing counterterrorism operations and security cooperation with regional allies.

Strategic Implications

The recent U.S. military buildup in the Middle East is designed to deter potential aggression from Iran, ensure the security of Israel and Arab states, and maintain the stability of key shipping lanes, particularly in the Strait of Hormuz. The advanced capabilities deployed, including stealth aircraft, missile defense systems, and amphibious forces, reflect the U.S.’s commitment to defending its interests and allies in a highly volatile region. However, this buildup also increases the risk of escalation, as it signals a readiness to engage militarily, if necessary, which could further heighten tensions with Iran and other regional actors.

The United States already maintains a significant military presence in the Middle East, strategically positioning its forces across the region to protect its interests, and ensure the security of key allies (Israel) and project power. Here is a brief overview of some key US military bases in the Middle East:

1. Al Udeid Air Base

Country: Qatar

City: Near Doha

Number of Troops: Approximately 10,000

Weapons: Hosts F-15, F-16, and F-22 fighter jets, bombers, reconnaissance aircraft, and drones.

Combat Readiness: High combat readiness; serves as a forward headquarters for U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) and U.S. Air Forces Central Command (AFCENT).

Threat Posed: Provides rapid response capabilities throughout the Middle East, projecting airpower and supporting operations against terrorist groups such as ISIS.

2. Al Dhafra Air Base

Country: United Arab Emirates

City: Near Abu Dhabi

Number of Troops: Approximately 3,500

Weapons: F-35s, F-15s, F-16s, and KC-10 refueling aircraft.

Combat Readiness: High combat readiness; a critical hub for aerial operations over the Arabian Peninsula and beyond.

Threat Posed: Enhances U.S. ability to conduct operations in the Middle East, including airstrikes, reconnaissance, and logistics support.

3. Camp Arifjan

Country: Kuwait

City: Near Kuwait City

Number of Troops: Approximately 7,000

Weapons: Armored vehicles, artillery, logistics, and support equipment.

Combat Readiness: High; serves as a logistical and command hub for U.S. Army operations in the region.

Threat Posed: Supports U.S. ground forces and plays a key role in the rapid deployment of troops and equipment across the Middle East.

4. Naval Support Activity Bahrain

Country: Bahrain

City: Manama

Number of Troops: Approximately 7,000

Weapons: Naval vessels, including destroyers, cruisers, and support ships, as well as maritime surveillance aircraft.

Combat Readiness: High; headquarters for the U.S. Navy’s 5th Fleet.

Threat Posed: Ensures maritime security in the Persian Gulf, Strait of Hormuz, and surrounding waters, countering threats from Iran and securing key shipping lanes.

5. Ain al-Asad Airbase

Country: Iraq

City: Al Anbar Province

Number of Troops: Approximately 2,000 (fluctuates based on mission needs)

Weapons: Drones, artillery, and support vehicles.

Combat Readiness: High; provides support for counterterrorism operations against remnants of ISIS.

Threat Posed: Supports the Iraqi government and U.S. interests in maintaining stability and countering terrorism in Iraq.

6. Prince Sultan Air Base

Country: Saudi Arabia

City: Near Al Kharj

Number of Troops: Approximately 2,500

Weapons: Patriot missile defense systems, F-15 and F-22 fighter jets.

Combat Readiness: High; primarily focused on air defense and power projection in the region.

Threat Posed: Plays a crucial role in defending against aerial threats from Iran and securing Saudi airspace.

These bases are critical for maintaining U.S. influence and operational capabilities in the Middle East, allowing rapid response to emerging threats and support for regional allies. They also serve as deterrents against adversaries such as Iran and extremist groups, but their presence can also be a source of tension in the region.

A Grim Scenario:

There is growing concern that the United States, in a desperate bid to assert its fading supremacy, may resort to using its military might in an increasingly reckless manner. Alarmingly, the Middle East—a region that holds immense significance as the heart of the Muslim world—has been chosen as the stage for this display of power. The tragic consequence of this choice is that the primary victims will be Muslims, whether they are pro-American or anti-American, with the devastation impacting communities across the region.

The potential for total destruction and widespread disaster in the Middle East is palpable. The delicate balance of the region, already teetering on the edge due to longstanding conflicts and rivalries, could be utterly shattered. The U.S.’s decision to focus its military strength here underscores a dangerous escalation, one that appears driven by desperation rather than strategic foresight. Unfortunately, there seems to be little that can be done to halt this course of action.

Even the United Nations, the international body tasked with maintaining global peace and security, appears powerless to intervene effectively. This impotence is further compounded by the unwavering support that the U.S. provides to Israel, a nation that has consistently defied United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions and ignored rulings from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and other international bodies. Israel, emboldened by U.S. backing, continues to act with impunity, exacerbating tensions and further destabilizing the region.

In this grim scenario, the Middle East faces the prospect of unparalleled destruction, with the lives and futures of millions of Muslims at stake. The international community’s inability to curb these actions not only highlights the limitations of global governance but also sets a dangerous precedent for unchecked military aggression in a region already plagued by turmoil.

Repercussions:

If the United States succeeds in its ambitions, the world could once again be thrust into a unipolar order dominated by American hegemony. This would mean that humanity may find itself at the mercy of U.S. interests and policies, with little to no counterbalance to challenge or restrain American power. Such an outcome could result in widespread suffering, as nations and peoples across the globe might be subjected to the whims of a single superpower.

In a world where no other power is strong enough to provide a counterbalance, the U.S.-led global order could impose its will unchecked, dictating economic, political, and social terms to the rest of the world. The consequences of such dominance could be severe, with global governance potentially skewed to serve American interests at the expense of international cooperation, justice, and equity. The diversity of voices and perspectives that currently shape global discourse could be suppressed, leading to a world where the U.S. defines the rules and others are forced to comply.

This potential future is not just a threat to individual nations but to the concept of a multipolar world where power is shared and balanced among different global players. The resurgence of a unipolar order could stifle innovation, hinder global progress, and exacerbate inequalities, as the interests of a single nation overshadow the collective good. The world may face an era of instability, where the pursuit of American supremacy leads to further conflicts and the erosion of international norms designed to protect the rights and dignity of all humankind.

Obligation of Russia and China:

Russia and China bear a significant responsibility in countering the aggressive ambitions of the United States. As global powers, they are expected not only by regional countries but by the international community to stand firm against American attempts to impose their will unilaterally. Their support is crucial for enabling smaller nations to resist U.S. pressure, and in the unfortunate event of conflict, to defend their sovereignty and interests.

This situation presents both a challenge and an opportunity for Russia and China. By actively opposing U.S. hegemony, they can help preserve the multipolar balance that is vital for global stability. Their collaboration is essential in preventing the world from slipping back into a unipolar order, where a single nation dictates the terms of international relations.

The Russia-China alliance is not merely a strategic necessity but a counterbalance that can effectively challenge American dominance in global geopolitics. Through diplomatic, economic, and, if necessary, military means, Russia and China have the capacity to check U.S. ambitions and maintain equilibrium in the international system. Their combined efforts can ensure that power remains distributed and that the voices of multiple nations continue to shape the world’s future.

美国霸权和霸权:

美国一直寻求维持其全球霸权，这一目标几十年来一直影响着美国的外交政策。自克林顿政府以来，美国采取了各种措施来对抗俄罗斯的复兴和中国作为一个强大的全球大国的崛起。

在克林顿总统任期内，美国开始为旨在限制俄罗斯影响力和先发制人应对中国日益增长的经济和军事实力的政策奠定基础。这种做法在随后的几届政府中继续存在，尽管强度和重点有所不同。

在奥巴马总统的领导下，美国采取了一种更为微妙的战略。虽然奥巴马政府认识到有必要应对俄罗斯和中国构成的挑战，但它选择了一种更为慎重的方式，强调外交和经济接触。然而，奥巴马的“重返亚洲”政策标志着对中国崛起的明确认识，因为美国寻求加强在亚太地区的联盟，以平衡中国日益增长的影响力。

特朗普政府标志着美国战略的重大转变。特朗普总统公开宣布中国为战略竞争对手，并积极推行遏制中国崛起的政策。这包括贸易战、制裁以及使美国经济与中国经济脱钩的努力，所有这些都旨在遏制北京的全球野心。然而，特朗普对俄罗斯的态度明显不同;他经常淡化俄罗斯的威胁，并寻求与莫斯科建立更加和解的关系，这导致美国外交政策的信号好坏参半。

拜登政府上台后，美国的政策采取了更具对抗性的立场。拜登总统提出了一系列严厉的措施，旨在对抗俄罗斯的自信，特别是在东欧，并进一步遏制中国不断扩大的影响力。与他的前任不同，拜登采取了更全面的方法，将美国的盟友和伙伴团结在一起，共同对抗中国和俄罗斯。这包括加强北约，组建新的联盟，如AUKUS，并推动协调经济、军事和技术举措，以抵消来自这两个国家的威胁。

拜登政府的特点是采取明确、积极的战略，以确保美国在全球舞台上保持主导地位。通过外交压力、经济制裁、军事姿态和联盟建设，美国巩固了其对抗俄罗斯复兴和中国崛起的承诺，使其成为其外交政策议程的核心支柱。

美国无法维持其霸权地位;

然而，美国一直在努力与中国和俄罗斯在几个关键领域进行有效竞争，包括经济、政治和外交领域。随着中国通过“一带一路”等倡议在全球范围内扩大经济影响力，以及俄罗斯自信的外交和军事战略获得牵引力，美国发现其传统的主导地位日益受到挑战。这种转变导致全球反美情绪明显上升，因为许多国家认为美国是一个坚持过时的全球领导模式的衰落大国。

面对这些日益增长的挑战，美国开始严重质疑其在世界舞台上维持霸权和霸权的能力。美国意识到自己的经济和外交影响力正在减弱，因此采取了更为激进的军事力量展示方式，尤其是在中东地区。

为了重新确立其全球影响力，美国选择了中东作为展示其军事实力的焦点。本已充满紧张局势的该地区，已成为美国再次展示武力的舞台。美国一直在大力加强其在整个中东地区的军事存在，不仅在关键的战略要地，而且在整个地区扩大其军事建设。这包括部署更多的部队、先进的武器和复杂的战争机器，所有这些都旨在投射力量，并确保其在一个对全球能源供应和地缘政治稳定至关重要的地区的利益。

美国在中东的军事扩张凸显了其战略重心转向更强硬的方式，因为它试图弥补其在其他地区日益减弱的影响力。通过这样做，美国的目的是提醒世界它的军事能力，即使它的经济和外交主导地位继续面临严重挑战。

为了应对中东地区日益紧张的局势，特别是涉及以色列、阿拉伯国家和伊朗的紧张局势，美国最近加强了在该地区的军事存在。这种升级包括部署更多的军队、海军和先进的空中资产，以阻止潜在的冲突，并安抚地区盟友。

最近的部署:

杰拉尔德·r·福特号航母战斗群

地点:东地中海

海军力量:杰拉尔德·r·福特号航空母舰，美国海军最新最先进的航空母舰，以及它的战斗群，包括导弹驱逐舰、巡洋舰和支援船。

空军:航母战斗群将带来70多架飞机，包括F/A-18超级大黄蜂，E-2D鹰眼预警机和EA-18G咆哮者电子战。

武器与技术:先进雷达系统、导弹防御能力和尖端电子战系统。

目的:提供重要的空中和海上打击能力，随时准备迅速应对该地区的任何升级，特别是涉及伊朗的活动。

B-1B枪骑兵轰炸机

地点:卡塔尔乌代德空军基地

空军:部署B-1B“枪骑兵”战略轰炸机。

武器:能携带多种弹药，包括常规炸弹、巡航导弹和精确制导弹药。

先进技术:远程打击能力，高速，先进的雷达规避功能。

目的:增强美国执行远程打击任务的能力，并支持对伊朗和其他地区威胁的威慑努力。

F-35和F-15中队

地点:沙特阿拉伯、阿联酋和约旦的多个基地

空军:部署额外的F-35闪电II和F-15鹰战斗机。

武器:装备空对空导弹、精确制导炸弹和先进的瞄准系统。

先进技术:隐身能力(F-35)，卓越的机动性(F-15)和尖端的航空电子设备。

目的:增强该地区的空中优势、监视和打击能力，为任何空中威胁提供快速反应选项。

爱国者导弹防御系统和萨德

地点:沙特阿拉伯、阿联酋和其他海湾国家

空军:部署额外的爱国者导弹防御系统和末段高空区域防御(THAAD)系统。

武器:能够拦截中短程弹道导弹、巡航导弹和先进飞机。

先进技术:集成雷达和指挥系统，能够同时探测和消除多种威胁。

目的:加强地区导弹防御，防范潜在的伊朗弹道导弹袭击，保护关键基础设施和美国资产。

第26海军陆战队远征部队(MEU)的两栖准备群(ARG)

地点:阿拉伯海湾

海军力量:包括两栖攻击舰，如美国巴丹号，能够部署海军陆战队和他们的设备进行快速反应任务。

武器和技术:直升机，MV-22鱼鹰，两栖车辆和先进的后勤支持。

目的:提供一支能够进行两栖攻击、人道主义援助和快速部署地面部队以应对危机的多功能部队。

新增部队部署

地点:伊拉克、科威特、沙特阿拉伯和其他未公开地点

部队人数:已增派数千名部队。

武器与技术:配备先进的步兵武器、装甲车、无人机和电子战工具。

目的:加强美国的地面存在，改善快速部署的准备，并支持正在进行的反恐行动和与地区盟友的安全合作。

战略意义

最近美国在中东的军事集结是为了阻止来自伊朗的潜在侵略，确保以色列和阿拉伯国家的安全，并维持关键航道的稳定，特别是在霍尔木兹海峡。部署的先进能力，包括隐形飞机、导弹防御系统和两栖部队，反映了美国在一个高度动荡的地区捍卫其利益和盟友的承诺。然而，这种集结也增加了升级的风险，因为它表明，如果有必要，中国准备进行军事接触，这可能进一步加剧与伊朗和其他地区行为体的紧张关系。

美国已经在中东保持了重要的军事存在，在整个地区进行战略部署，以保护美国的利益，并确保关键盟友(以色列)的安全和投射力量。以下是美国在中东的一些重要军事基地的简要概述:

乌代德空军基地

卡塔尔国家:

城市:多哈附近

部队人数:约1万人

武器:拥有F-15、F-16和F-22战斗机、轰炸机、侦察机和无人机。

战备状态:高度战备状态;作为美国中央司令部(CENTCOM)和美国空军中央司令部(AFCENT)的前沿总部。

构成的威胁:在整个中东地区提供快速反应能力，投射空中力量并支持打击ISIS等恐怖组织的行动。

Al Dhafra空军基地

国家:阿拉伯联合酋长国

城市:阿布扎比附近

部队人数:约3500人

武器:f -35、f -15、f -16和KC-10加油机。

战备状态:高度战备状态;是阿拉伯半岛及其他地区空中作战的重要枢纽。

构成的威胁:增强美国在中东开展行动的能力，包括空袭、侦察和后勤支持。

营Arifjan

国家:科威特

城市:靠近科威特城

部队人数:约7000人

武器:装甲车、火炮、后勤和支援设备。

战备状态:高;作为美国陆军在该地区行动的后勤和指挥中心。

构成的威胁:支持美国地面部队，并在整个中东地区快速部署部队和装备方面发挥关键作用。

海军支援活动巴林

国家:巴林

城市:麦纳麦

部队人数:约7000人

武器:海军舰艇，包括驱逐舰、巡洋舰和支援舰，以及海上侦察机。

战备状态:高;这里是美国海军第五舰队总部。

构成的威胁:确保波斯湾、霍尔木兹海峡及周边水域的海上安全，反击来自伊朗的威胁，确保主要航道的安全。

阿萨德空军基地

国家:伊拉克

城市:安巴尔省

部队人数:约2 000人(根据特派团需要浮动)

武器:无人机、火炮和支援车辆。

战备状态:高;为打击ISIS残余分子的反恐行动提供支持。

构成的威胁:支持伊拉克政府和美国在维护伊拉克稳定和打击恐怖主义方面的利益。

苏丹王子空军基地

国家:沙特阿拉伯

城市:靠近Al Kharj

部队人数:约2500人

武器:爱国者导弹防御系统，F-15和F-22战斗机。

战备状态:高;主要集中在该地区的防空和力量投送。

构成的威胁:在防御来自伊朗的空中威胁和确保沙特领空安全方面发挥着至关重要的作用。

这些基地对于维持美国在中东的影响力和作战能力至关重要，可以对新出现的威胁做出快速反应，并为地区盟友提供支持。它们也对伊朗和极端组织等对手起到威慑作用，但它们的存在也可能成为该地区紧张局势的根源。

严峻的前景:

人们越来越担心，美国在孤注一掷地维护其日渐衰落的霸权地位时，可能会以越来越鲁莽的方式动用其军事力量。令人担忧的是，中东——一个作为穆斯林世界的中心而具有巨大意义的地区——被选为展示权力的舞台。这种选择的悲剧性后果是，主要受害者将是穆斯林，无论他们是亲美还是反美，破坏影响了整个地区的社区。

中东发生全面破坏和大范围灾难的可能性是显而易见的。由于长期的冲突和对抗，该地区已经摇摇欲坠的微妙平衡可能会被彻底打破。美国将其军事力量集中在这里的决定凸显出一种危险的升级，这种升级似乎是出于绝望，而非战略远见。不幸的是，似乎没有什么可以阻止这一行动进程。

即使是负责维护全球和平与安全的国际机构联合国，似乎也无力进行有效干预。以色列一贯蔑视联合国安理会(UNSC)的决议，无视国际法院(ICJ)和其他国际机构的裁决，美国对以色列的坚定支持进一步加剧了这种无能。在美国的支持下，以色列继续肆无忌惮地行动，加剧了紧张局势，进一步破坏了该地区的稳定。

在这种严峻的情况下，中东面临着前所未有的毁灭前景，数百万穆斯林的生命和未来岌岌可危。国际社会无法遏制这些行动，不仅突出了全球治理的局限性，而且也为一个已经动荡不安的地区不受控制的军事侵略树立了一个危险的先例。

影响:

如果美国成功实现其野心，世界可能再次被推入由美国霸权主导的单极秩序。这将意味着人类可能会发现自己受美国利益和政策的摆布，几乎没有制衡美国力量的力量。这样的结果可能会导致广泛的痛苦，因为全球各国和人民可能会受到一个超级大国的反复无常的影响。

在一个没有其他大国强大到足以抗衡的世界里，美国领导的全球秩序可以不受约束地将自己的意志强加给世界其他国家，支配经济、政治和社会条件。这种主导地位的后果可能是严重的，全球治理可能会以牺牲国际合作、正义和平等为代价，向美国利益倾斜。目前影响全球话语的声音和观点的多样性可能会受到压制，导致一个美国制定规则，其他国家被迫遵守的世界。

这种潜在的未来不仅是对个别国家的威胁，也是对多极世界概念的威胁，在多极世界中，权力在不同的全球参与者之间共享和平衡。单极秩序的复苏可能会扼杀创新，阻碍全球进步，加剧不平等，因为一个国家的利益盖过了集体利益。世界可能面临一个不稳定的时代，在这个时代，对美国霸权的追求将导致进一步的冲突，并侵蚀旨在保护全人类权利和尊严的国际准则。

俄罗斯和中国的义务:

俄罗斯和中国在对抗美国的侵略野心方面负有重大责任。作为全球大国，不仅地区国家，而且国际社会都希望中国坚决反对美国单方面将其意志强加于人的企图。他们的支持对于使小国能够抵抗美国的压力，并在不幸发生冲突的情况下捍卫自己的主权和利益至关重要。

这种形势对俄罗斯和中国来说既是挑战，也是机遇。通过积极反对美国霸权，它们可以帮助维护对全球稳定至关重要的多极平衡。他们的合作对于防止世界滑向单极秩序至关重要，在单极秩序中，一个国家决定国际关系的条件。

俄中联盟不仅是一种战略需要，而且是一种制衡，可以有效地挑战美国在全球地缘政治中的主导地位。通过外交、经济以及必要时的军事手段，俄罗斯和中国有能力遏制美国的野心并维持国际体系的平衡。他们的共同努力可以确保权力的分配，确保多个国家的声音继续塑造世界的未来。

(  注意： 本文是用AI翻译的，或有误差。请以原版英文为准。谢谢。)

Reference Link:- https://strafasia.com/us-military-built-up-in-the-middle-east-and-challenges-to-russia-china/