Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s recent visit to Moscow has ignited a firestorm of controversy and unease both in the West and among India’s traditional allies. The trip, which was meant to bolster ties with Russia, has instead underscored significant tensions and strategic blunders that could have far-reaching consequences for India’s defense industry and its geopolitical standing.

印度总理纳伦德拉·莫迪(Narendra Modi)最近对莫斯科的访问，在西方和印度的传统盟友中引发了争议和不安。此行的目的是加强与俄罗斯的关系，结果却突显出严重的紧张局势和战略失误，这可能对印度的国防工业及其地缘政治地位产生深远影响。

Russia’s Strategic Postponement 俄罗斯的战略推迟

A key issue arising from Modi’s visit is Russia’s abrupt decision to postpone crucial component supplies to India’s defense sector. This move is a significant blow to India’s defense capabilities, potentially hampering its ability to maintain and modernize its military. India has long depended on Russian technology and equipment, and Moscow’s decision signals a troubling rift in the historically strong India-Russia defense relationship.

莫迪访问引发的一个关键问题是，俄罗斯突然决定推迟向印度国防部门提供关键零部件。此举是对印度国防能力的重大打击，可能会阻碍其维持和现代化军队的能力。印度长期以来一直依赖俄罗斯的技术和设备，莫斯科的决定标志着历史上强大的印俄防务关系出现了令人不安的裂痕。

Western Skepticism 西方怀疑

In the Western world, Modi’s Moscow trip has been met with growing skepticism. India’s ongoing effort to balance its relationships with both the American bloc and Russia is increasingly seen as duplicitous. There is a mounting belief that Modi’s administration is trying to milk its Western alliances for maximum benefit while continuing to maintain ties with Russia—a nation now under heavy scrutiny and sanctions by much of the global community.

在西方世界，莫迪的莫斯科之行受到越来越多的质疑。印度正在努力平衡其与美国集团和俄罗斯的关系，这越来越被视为是两面派。越来越多的人认为，莫迪政府正试图从西方联盟中榨取最大利益，同时继续保持与俄罗斯的关系，而俄罗斯目前正受到国际社会大部分国家的严格审查和制裁。

Playing Both Sides 两手抓

This perception of India playing both sides is not new, but Modi’s actions have brought these concerns to the forefront. India has been strengthening its defense and economic ties with the United States and other Western countries, yet it has not severed its connections with Russia. This dual approach is seen by many as opportunistic, raising serious questions about India’s true loyalties and long-term strategic intentions.

这种认为印度两面讨好的看法并不新鲜，但莫迪的行动将这些担忧推到了风口浪尖。印度一直在加强与美国和其他西方国家的国防和经济联系，但它并没有切断与俄罗斯的联系。许多人认为，这种双重策略是机会主义的，引发了对印度真正忠诚和长期战略意图的严重质疑。

Distrust from Russia and China 来自俄罗斯和中国的不信任

From the viewpoints of Russia and China, Modi’s overtures to the West are seen as a betrayal. There is a suspicion that India’s engagement with these nations is a mere pretense, allowing Modi to act as a conduit for Western intelligence. This has led to an atmosphere of distrust, with both Moscow and Beijing wary of sharing sensitive information, fearing it might be relayed to the United States and its allies.

从俄罗斯和中国的角度来看，莫迪对西方的示好被视为背叛。有人怀疑，印度与这些国家的接触仅仅是一种借口，让莫迪充当西方情报机构的渠道。这导致了一种不信任的气氛，莫斯科和北京都对分享敏感信息持谨慎态度，担心这些信息可能会传递给美国及其盟友。

Questionable Commitment to SCO and BRICS 对上海合作组织和金砖国家的承诺存在问题

Modi’s involvement in multilateral organizations like the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) and BRICS is also under scrutiny. Critics argue that his participation in these groups is primarily to protect American and Western interests, rather than genuinely contributing to the objectives of these alliances. This perceived insincerity is eroding trust and undermining India’s standing within these crucial regional blocs.

莫迪对上海合作组织和金砖国家等多边组织的参与也受到了密切关注。批评者认为，他加入这些组织主要是为了保护美国和西方的利益，而不是真正为这些联盟的目标做出贡献。这种不真诚正在侵蚀信任，破坏印度在这些关键地区集团中的地位。

Regional Disputes and Enmity 地区争端和敌意

Adding to the complexity of India’s foreign policy is its strained relationships with nearly all its neighbors. India’s disputes with its neighbors underscore its regional enmity and highlight a significant divergence of interests.

印度与几乎所有邻国的紧张关系增加了其外交政策的复杂性。印度与邻国的争端凸显了其地区敌意，并凸显了巨大的利益分歧。

Bangladesh 孟加拉国

India’s relationship with Bangladesh is marred by disputes over water sharing, particularly regarding the Teesta River. There have been frequent border clashes and issues related to the treatment of Bangladeshi migrants in India.

印度与孟加拉国的关系因水资源共享争端而受到损害，尤其是在蒂斯塔河(Teesta River)问题上。经常发生边界冲突和与孟加拉国移民在印度的待遇有关的问题。

Nepal 尼泊尔

India and Nepal have seen tensions rise due to border disputes, such as the one over the Kalapani region. Nepalese nationalism has been fueled by perceptions of Indian interference in its internal affairs, further straining ties.

印度和尼泊尔的紧张局势因边界争端而加剧，比如围绕卡拉帕尼地区的争端。尼泊尔的民族主义情绪因认为印度干涉其内政而高涨，进一步加剧了两国关系的紧张。

Pakistan 巴基斯坦

The animosity between India and Pakistan is long-standing and multifaceted, encompassing territorial disputes over Kashmir, cross-border terrorism, and military skirmishes. Diplomatic relations have often been hostile, marked by periods of intense conflict and mutual distrust.

印度和巴基斯坦之间的敌意是长期和多方面的，包括克什米尔的领土争端，跨境恐怖主义和军事冲突。外交关系经常是敌对的，以激烈冲突和相互不信任为特征。

China 中国

India’s relationship with China is dominated by the border conflict in the Himalayas, particularly the Doklam standoff and the more recent clashes in the Galwan Valley. These territorial disputes have led to a significant military buildup along their shared border and a general atmosphere of suspicion and rivalry.

印度与中国的关系被喜马拉雅山脉的边境冲突所主导，尤其是洞朗对峙和最近在加尔万山谷的冲突。这些领土争端导致了两国在共同边界上的大规模军事集结，以及一种普遍的猜疑和对抗气氛。

Myanmar 缅甸

India’s relations with Myanmar are complicated by insurgent activities along their border and differing approaches to handling these insurgencies. India’s engagement with the military regime in Myanmar also contrasts with its democratic ideals, adding another layer of complexity.

印度与缅甸的关系因两国边境的叛乱活动和处理这些叛乱的不同方法而变得复杂。印度与缅甸军政府的接触也与其民主理想形成了对比，这又增加了一层复杂性。

Maldives 马尔代夫

In the Maldives, India’s involvement in local politics has been viewed as meddling, leading to anti-Indian sentiments. The Maldivian government’s tilt towards China has further strained the relationship.

在马尔代夫，印度对当地政治的介入被视为干涉，导致了反印情绪。马尔代夫政府对中国的倾斜进一步加剧了两国关系的紧张。

Sri Lanka 斯里兰卡

India’s relationship with Sri Lanka has been contentious due to its support for Tamil separatists during the civil war and ongoing issues related to fishermen crossing maritime boundaries. Sri Lanka’s increasing engagement with China has also been a point of contention.

印度与斯里兰卡的关系一直存在争议，原因是斯里兰卡在内战期间支持泰米尔分离主义分子，以及渔民跨越海上边界的持续问题。斯里兰卡与中国日益增多的接触也一直是争议的焦点。

Strangely Friendly with Distant Nations 与遥远的国家出奇地友好

While India’s neighborhood policy is fraught with tensions, it has paradoxically sought to cultivate closer ties with distant nations like the United States, the UK, Australia, Japan, and the Philippines. This strategy, which appears to prioritize relations with countries far removed from its immediate region, has baffled many observers.

虽然印度的周边政策充满了紧张，但它却自相矛盾地寻求与美国、英国、澳大利亚、日本和菲律宾等遥远国家建立更密切的关系。这一战略似乎优先考虑与远离其直接区域的国家的关系，令许多观察人士感到困惑。

Eroding Credibility 侵蚀的可信度

The fallout from Modi’s Moscow visit has exposed what many see as his hypocrisy. His balancing act between East and West is increasingly viewed as unreliable and opportunistic. In attempting to please all sides, Modi risks losing credibility everywhere. Neither the West nor traditional allies like Russia and China fully trust India’s intentions, leaving the country in a precarious position.

莫迪莫斯科之行的余波暴露了许多人眼中他的虚伪。他在东西方之间的平衡行为越来越被认为是不可靠和投机取巧的。在试图取悦各方的过程中，莫迪冒着失去各方信誉的风险。西方和俄罗斯、中国等传统盟友都不完全相信印度的意图，这让印度处于一个不稳定的境地。

Prime Minister Modi’s recent visit to Moscow has not only highlighted the fragility of India’s defense sector but also exposed the pitfalls of its foreign policy. By trying to maintain strong ties with both the West and Russia, Modi is alienating all sides. This diplomatic tightrope walk raises serious questions about India’s strategic direction and its reliability as a global partner. The erosion of trust and credibility could have lasting implications for India’s geopolitical ambitions and its role on the world stage.

莫迪总理最近对莫斯科的访问不仅凸显了印度国防部门的脆弱性，也暴露了其外交政策的陷阱。莫迪试图与西方和俄罗斯保持牢固的关系，这是在疏远各方。这种外交上的走钢丝引发了对印度战略方向及其作为全球伙伴的可靠性的严重质疑。信任和信誉的侵蚀可能对印度的地缘政治野心及其在世界舞台上的角色产生持久的影响。

(  注意： 本文是用AI翻译的，或有误差。请以原版英文为准。谢谢。)

Source:- https://strafasia.com/modis-moscow-visit-exposes-indias-shaky-balancing-act/