In a bold, characteristically unilateral move, former President Donald Trump recently hinted at imposing a 100 percent tariff on BRICS countries if they move away from using the US dollar as their reserve currency. Coupled with remarks suggesting Canada should become a U.S. state to avoid such tariffs, these statements underscore the potential for disruptive shifts in global trade policies. While his rhetoric may resonate with segments of his political base, the broader implications for global trade and the American economy warrant serious scrutiny.

Impact on Global Trade and the BRICS Block

Trump’s proposed policies could intensify already growing efforts by BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) to reduce reliance on the US dollar. With full membership recently granted to Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia, and the UAE, BRICS is becoming an increasingly influential bloc. For countries like China—poised to overtake the US as the largest global economy in the coming decade—such tariffs would likely accelerate efforts to establish alternative trading currencies, bypassing the dollar’s dominance.

The weaponization of tariffs and sanctions, hallmarks of Trump’s administration, has already driven countries like Russia and China to seek financial independence through mechanisms like the BRICS corridor, enabling sanctioned nations to sustain trade. A tariff war of this magnitude would push more countries to join these alternative economic frameworks, undermining long-term US influence.

Specific Impact on China

China, as the largest economy within BRICS and a critical player in global trade, would be disproportionately affected by Trump’s proposed tariffs. Given its position as the “world’s factory,” the US is one of China’s largest export markets for electronics, machinery, and consumer goods. A 100 percent tariff on Chinese goods would significantly disrupt this dynamic, leading to a sharp decline in trade volumes between the two nations.

Domestically, China might face short-term challenges, including reduced export revenues and disruptions to supply chains. However, these pressures are likely to accelerate China’s long-term strategies to reduce reliance on the US market. This includes:

Boosting Regional Trade: Through mechanisms like the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), China could deepen trade ties within Asia.

Expanding BRICS Partnerships: Leveraging the BRICS corridor and partnerships with other members, China could establish alternative markets for its goods and services.

Advancing Technological Independence: Already focused on self-reliance in critical industries like semiconductors and AI, China would likely double down on domestic innovation to mitigate the impact of tariffs.

Moreover, the proposed tariffs would provide fresh impetus for China’s efforts to internationalize the yuan as an alternative reserve currency, challenging the dominance of the dollar. If successful, this could fundamentally reshape global financial systems, further reducing the US’s leverage over international trade.

China is also well-positioned to capitalize on the fallout by presenting itself as a champion of globalization and fair trade, contrasting starkly with the US’s protectionist approach. This narrative could help Beijing strengthen alliances with other nations disillusioned by unilateral American policies, potentially enhancing its global influence while further isolating the US.

Consequences for the US Economy and Public

High tariffs, often marketed as protecting domestic industries, can backfire by increasing costs for American consumers and businesses. For example:

Increased Consumer Prices: Tariffs on imported goods from BRICS countries—key suppliers of affordable electronics, textiles, and raw materials—would lead to higher costs for everyday goods.

Retaliation: Counter-tariffs from affected countries could harm US exporters, particularly in agriculture and high-tech industries.

Disruption of Supply Chains: Businesses reliant on global supply chains would face operational challenges, reducing their competitiveness.

The economic strain from these tariffs would disproportionately impact low- and middle-income Americans, who spend a larger share of their income on goods likely affected by such policies.

Transforming Global Alliances

Trump’s approach could inadvertently catalyze new global alliances. Disaffected nations, particularly in the Global South, may find common cause in resisting US economic coercion. These developments could reshape global trade routes, with China leading initiatives like the Belt and Road and fostering economic corridors with BRICS and beyond.

For instance:

Emerging Trading Blocs: New alliances could coalesce around BRICS, creating alternative trade structures that diminish US dominance in global commerce.

Shift to Regionalism: Nations may prioritize regional trade agreements, reducing exposure to US tariff policies.

Increased Financial Decoupling: Efforts to establish non-dollar-based financial systems would gain momentum, weakening the US’s ability to use economic levers as foreign policy tools.

Way Forward: Preventing a Global Trade Crisis

To mitigate the fallout from Trump’s proposed tariffs, a collective strategy by affected nations is imperative. Some measures include:

Strengthening Multilateral Forums: Revitalizing the WTO or creating alternative dispute resolution mechanisms to counter unilateral actions.

Diversifying Trade Partnerships: Expanding trade relationships within Asia, Africa, and Latin America to reduce dependence on the US market.

Promoting Dialogue: Diplomatic channels should remain open to negotiate mutually beneficial trade terms rather than escalating retaliatory measures.

Investing in Domestic Resilience: Nations must bolster local industries and innovate to reduce reliance on imports, particularly from tariff-imposing countries.

Further Isolation of America

While Trump’s rhetoric aims to project strength, such policies risk isolating the US from the global economy. History has shown that economic isolation rarely leads to sustainable growth. Instead, America could face new challenges, including the erosion of its financial hegemony and increased hostility from former allies.

If pursued, these tariffs would likely prove counterproductive, harming the very constituencies they are intended to protect while accelerating shifts in global power structures. To avoid this, it is crucial for US policymakers to embrace multilateralism, foster fair trade, and acknowledge the interconnectedness of the modern global economy.

The world is watching, and the choices made in the coming months will define not only America’s economic future but also its standing in a rapidly changing world order.

美国前总统唐纳德·特朗普最近做出了一个大胆的、典型的单边举动，暗示如果金砖国家不再使用美元作为储备货币，他将对这些国家征收100%的关税。再加上有关加拿大应该成为美国一个州以避免此类关税的言论，这些声明突显了全球贸易政策发生破坏性转变的可能性。虽然他的言论可能会引起部分政治基础的共鸣，但对全球贸易和美国经济的更广泛影响值得认真审视。

对全球贸易和金砖国家的影响

特朗普提出的政策可能会加强金砖国家（巴西、俄罗斯、印度、中国、南非）减少对美元依赖的努力。随着伊朗、埃及、埃塞俄比亚和阿联酋最近成为金砖国家的正式成员国，金砖国家正成为一个越来越有影响力的集团。对于中国等即将在未来十年取代美国成为全球最大经济体的国家来说，这样的关税可能会加速建立替代交易货币的努力，绕过美元的主导地位。

作为特朗普政府的标志，关税和制裁武器化已经促使俄罗斯和中国等国家通过金砖国家走廊等机制寻求财政独立，使受制裁国家能够维持贸易。如此大规模的关税战将推动更多国家加入这些替代性经济框架，削弱美国的长期影响力。

对中国的具体影响

作为金砖国家中最大的经济体和全球贸易的关键参与者，中国将受到特朗普提议的关税的不成比例的影响。鉴于其“世界工厂”的地位，美国是中国最大的电子、机械和消费品出口市场之一。对中国商品征收100%的关税将严重破坏这种动态，导致两国之间的贸易额急剧下降。

在国内，中国可能面临短期挑战，包括出口收入减少和供应链中断。然而，这些压力可能会加速中国实施减少对美国市场依赖的长期战略。这包括:

•促进区域贸易：通过区域全面经济伙伴关系（RCEP）等机制，中国可以深化亚洲内部的贸易关系。

•扩大金砖国家伙伴关系：利用金砖走廊和与其他成员国的伙伴关系，中国可以为其商品和服务建立替代市场。

推进技术独立：中国已经专注于半导体和人工智能等关键行业的自力更生，可能会加大国内创新力度，以减轻关税的影响。

此外，拟议中的关税将为中国推动人民币国际化、成为替代储备货币的努力提供新的动力，挑战美元的主导地位。如果成功，这可能从根本上重塑全球金融体系，进一步降低美国对国际贸易的影响力。

中国也处于有利地位，将自己塑造成全球化和公平贸易的捍卫者，与美国的保护主义做法形成鲜明对比，从而利用这一后果。这种说法可能有助于北京方面加强与其他对美国单边政策失望的国家的联盟，在进一步孤立美国的同时，有可能增强中国的全球影响力。

对美国经济和公众的影响

通常以保护国内产业为卖点的高关税，可能会适得其反，增加美国消费者和企业的成本。例如:

消费者价格上涨：对来自金砖国家（廉价电子产品、纺织品和原材料的主要供应国）的进口商品征收关税，将导致日常商品成本上升。

•报复：来自受影响国家的反制关税可能会损害美国出口商，尤其是农业和高科技行业的出口商。

•供应链中断：依赖全球供应链的企业将面临运营挑战，从而降低竞争力。

这些关税带来的经济压力将对中低收入美国人造成不成比例的影响，他们将收入的更大一部分用于购买可能受此类政策影响的商品。

转变全球联盟

特朗普的做法可能会在不经意间催生新的全球联盟。心怀不满的国家，尤其是全球南方国家，可能会发现抵制美国经济胁迫的共同理由。这些发展可能会重塑全球贸易路线，中国将领导“一带一路”等倡议，并与金砖国家及其他国家建立经济走廊。

例如:

•新兴贸易集团：新联盟可能围绕金砖国家联合起来，创建替代贸易结构，削弱美国在全球商业中的主导地位。

•转向地区主义：各国可能优先考虑区域贸易协定，减少对美国关税政策的影响。

金融脱钩加剧：建立非美元金融体系的努力将获得动力，削弱美国使用经济杠杆作为外交政策工具的能力。

未来之路：防止全球贸易危机

为了减轻特朗普提议的关税带来的影响，受影响国家必须采取集体战略。一些措施包括：

•加强多边论坛：重振世贸组织或建立替代性争端解决机制，以对抗单边行动。

•贸易伙伴多样化：扩大亚洲、非洲和拉丁美洲内部的贸易关系，减少对美国市场的依赖。

促进对话：外交渠道应保持开放，以谈判互利的贸易条件，而不是升级报复措施。

•投资于国内弹性：各国必须支持当地工业和创新，以减少对进口的依赖，特别是对征收关税的国家的依赖。

美国的进一步孤立

尽管特朗普的言论旨在展示实力，但此类政策可能会使美国与全球经济隔绝。历史表明，经济孤立很少能带来可持续增长。相反，美国可能面临新的挑战，包括其金融霸权受到侵蚀，以及来自前盟友的敌意加剧。

如果付诸实施，这些关税可能会适得其反，损害它们原本打算保护的选民群体，同时加速全球权力结构的转变。为了避免这种情况，美国政策制定者必须拥抱多边主义，促进公平贸易，并承认现代全球经济的相互关联性。

全世界都在关注，未来几个月做出的选择不仅将决定美国经济的未来，还将决定美国在快速变化的世界秩序中的地位。

(  注意： 本文是用AI翻译的，或有误差。请以原版英文为准。谢谢。)

Reference Link:- https://www2.apdnews.cn/en/item/24/1209/axjdkcnna1af34a7cfd5ad.html